Primary finding
Probable cause
The pilot's loss of control due to spatial disorientation in dark night conditions. Contributing to the accident was his inadequate weather planning, lack of experience flying at night and the deteriorating weather conditions.
Investigator assessment
Analysis narrative
The pilot departed on a visual flight rules cross-country flight in dark night conditions. Radar data indicated that, about 9 miles from the destination airport, the airplane turned left from its previously established heading and shortly thereafter, it entered a steep, descending right turn that continued until radar contact was lost. The airplane impacted heavily-wooded terrain about 8 miles from the airport. Examination of the wreckage revealed no preimpact mechanical deficiencies that would have precluded normal operation of the airplane or engine. AIRMETs for instrument flight rules conditions and turbulence were valid at the time of the accident for the area of the accident site. Although the weather observation nearest the accident site around the time of the accident indicated visual flight rules conditions with an overcast cloud ceiling about 5,000 ft above ground level, a witness near the accident site reported an "extremely low cloud deck" at the time of the accident. Further, the weather observations at an airport south of the pilot's destination airport indicated weather conditions were deteriorating. While the pilot did text his girlfriend an image of convective weather activity, there was no record that the pilot obtained a weather briefing for the flight or requested any weather information from flight service or commercial sources. The pilot had received his private pilot certificate about 2 months before the accident and did not have an instrument rating. Autopsy of the pilot revealed evidence of severe atherosclerotic coronary artery disease and an old myocardial infarction; however, the circumstances of the accident are more consistent with a loss of control due to spatial disorientation than with pilot incapacitation. The pilot's lack of an instrument rating and the dark night conditions both would have been conducive to the development of spatial disorientation, and the airplane's descending turn and high-energy impact are both consistent with the known effects of spatial disorientation.
Source record
Factual narrative
HISTORY OF FLIGHT On May 28, 2019, at 2355 eastern daylight time, a Piper PA-28R-180, N3933T, was destroyed when it was involved in an accident near Auburn Township, Ohio. The private pilot was fatally injured. The airplane was operated as a Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91 personal flight. The pilot departed Cincinnati Lunken Airport (LUK), Cincinnati, Ohio, about 2209, and was destined for Geauga County Airport (7G8), Middlefield, Ohio. The pilot was not communicating with air traffic control and there were no recorded communications with the airplane during the flight. A review of radar data revealed that the airplane was flying directly toward 7G8 on a northeasterly heading. At 2354:41, when the airplane was about 9.6 nautical miles from the airport at an altitude of 2,525 ft mean sea level (msl) and a groundspeed of 136 knots (kts), it made a left turn to the north-northwest and proceeded toward the LaDue Reservoir. As the airplane reached the southeast bank of the reservoir at 2355:21, it was at an altitude of 2,300 ft msl and a groundspeed of 129 kts. The airplane then entered a steep, descending right turn before the data ended at 2355:31. At that time, the airplane's heading was 104° at an altitude of 1,300 ft msl and a groundspeed of 169 kts. According to the pilot's girlfriend, she and her daughter had been camping with the pilot in Kentucky during the days before the accident. The girlfriend said that she drove home (near 7G8) and the pilot flew her daughter to LUK so that she could then take a commercial flight from the major airport in Cincinnati. The girlfriend stated that the pilot landed at LUK about 1800, and his departure to 7G8 was delayed due to weather. The pilot texted her at 2209 and said that he was on his way with an estimated time of arrival of 2330. About 16 minutes after the pilot departed, he sent her a picture of the instrument panel, which was illuminated. The airplane was level at 5,400 ft msl, on a heading of 055°, and all the electronic engine gauges (oil temperature, oil pressure, and fuel pressure) were within the normal range. The manifold pressure was 23 inches and the tachometer indicated 2,330 rpm. The electronic fuel gauges indicated that the right tank was slightly below full and the left tank was full. At 2226, the pilot sent his girlfriend a text asking about the weather. She stated, "Lots of storms that way…Still raining hard and thundering here." She sent additional texts about the weather and asked him how the flight was going, but the pilot did not respond. A witness stated that he was out walking his dogs around midnight when he heard an aircraft flying from south to north toward the reservoir. Initially, he was not sure if it was an airplane or a helicopter because the engine did not sound typical for either aircraft. The witness then concluded it was an airplane that sounded as if the engine was "sputtering" and that it "definitely had an erratic engine sound." The witness said he raised his "spotlight" to the sky and noted an "extremely low cloud deck." He then entered his home and heard "a very loud thud/boom." The witness said his wife also heard the "boom" but they both thought it was thunder since storms had just passed through the area. It was not until the next day that the witness realized the airplane had crashed. PERSONAL INFORMATION The pilot was issued his private pilot certificate on March 24, 2019. He had accrued 3.7 hours of simulated instrument time and 11.8 hours at night. The pilot did not have an instrument rating. METEOROLOGICAL INFORMATION The closest weather reporting facility to the accident site was located at Portage County Airport (POV), Ravenna, Ohio, about 12 miles south of the accident site. The 2355 observation included was calm wind calm, visibility 7 miles visibility, scattered clouds at 5,000 ft above ground level (agl), temperature 18° C, dew point 17° C, and an altimeter setting of 29.76 inches of Hg. The 0015 observation included calm wind, 1 1/4 miles visibility, scattered clouds at 200 ft and 4,800 ft agl, temperature 18°C, dew point 17°C, and an altimeter setting of 29.76 inches of Hg. The National Weather Service had issued AIRMET Sierra for instrument flight rules (IFR) conditions and AIRMET Tango for moderate turbulence from the surface to 15,000 ft, both of which were valid at the time of the accident over the area of the accident site. A search of the FAA's contract Automated Flight Service Station (AFSS) provider, Leidos, revealed that the pilot filed a visual flight rules flight plan for the flight using the Garmin pilot application; however, the pilot did not request any weather or route briefings. A search of ForeFlight indicated that the pilot did not contact Foreflight on the day of the accident. Though the pilot sent a screenshot of weather radar in a text to his girlfriend, beyond this it is unknown what weather information the pilot may have accessed before departing on the flight. At the time of the accident, both the sun and the moon were more than 15° below the horizon and provided no illumination. WRECKAGE AND IMPACT INFORMATION The airplane came to rest in heavily wooded terrain on the southeast bank of the reservoir about 8 miles southwest of 7G8. The initial impact point was a 70- to 80-ft-tall tree. Impact marks on the trees became progressively lower on a heading of 133°; the airplane impacted the ground in a nose-low attitude. The distance between the initial impact to the point where the engine came to rest was about 270 ft. The airplane was heavily fragmented, and the outboard sections of both wings, the tail section, instrument panel, engine, and the propeller were found along the wreckage path. The largest portion of debris was a section of fuselage that contained the front and rear seats. There was no postimpact fire. Examination of the airplane revealed that the flaps and landing gear were fully retracted. The stabilator trim actuator was found in the full nose-down position. Flight control cables for all major flight controls were accounted for and found broken in numerous areas. The broken ends of these cables exhibited broom-straw fractures consistent with overstress. Both wing fuel tanks were breached and the finger screens were absent of debris. The fuel selector had separated from the airframe but was found selected to the right tank. The gascolator had also separated from the airframe and only the bowl section, which was crushed, was located. The electric fuel pump separated from the airframe and was functional when electrical current was applied. The engine-driven fuel pump was impact damaged and could not be tested. The fuel servo had partially separated from the engine and sustained impact damage. The finger screen was found in the wreckage and was absent of debris. The servo was disassembled, and the diaphragms were intact. The fuel manifold sustained impact damage but remained secure to the engine. The manifold was disassembled and no fuel was found in the housing. The diaphragm was not damaged. The oil sump was impact separated from the engine. The oil filter was disassembled and the filament was absent of debris. The engine sustained impact damage. The No. 2 cylinder was partially separated from the engine case and the No. 4 cylinder was slightly displaced from the engine case and missing the rocker cover. The top and bottom spark plugs sustained impact damage and were removed. The electrodes appeared light gray in color consistent with normal wear per the Champion Check-A-Plug chart. A borescope was used to internally examine the engine. A large amount of mud and dirt was observed, but no internal damage to the pistons and valves was noted. The engine was manually rotated via the vacuum pump drive-spline, which was inhibited by the debris, but valve train movement was observed on all cylinders except the No. 2 cylinder due to it being se