LAX08FA286

A loss of power in the right engine due to an in-flight fuel-fed fire in the right engine compartment that, while the exact origin could not be determined, was likely related to the right engine-driven fuel pump, its fuel supply line, or fitting. Contributing to the accident was the pilot's failure to adhere to the POH's procedures for responding to the fire and configuring the airplane to reduce aerodynamic drag.

During climb a few minutes after takeoff, a fire erupted in the airplane's right engine compartment. About 7 miles from the departure airport, the pilot reversed course and notified the air traffic controller that he was declaring an emergency. As the pilot was proceeding back toward the departure airport witnesses observed fire beneath, and smoke trailing from, the right engine and heard boom sounds or explosions as the airplane descended. Although the pilot feathered the right engine's propeller, the airplane's descent continued. The 12-minute flight ended about 1.25 miles from the runway when the airplane impacted trees and power lines before coming to rest upside down adjacent to a private residence. A fuel-fed fire consumed the airframe and damaged nearby private residences. The airplane was owned and operated by an airplane broker that intended to have it ferried to Korea. In preparation for the overseas ferry flight, the airplane's engines were overhauled. Maintenance was also performed on various components including the engine-driven fuel pumps, turbochargers, and propellers. Nacelle fuel tanks were installed and the airplane received an annual inspection. Thereafter, the broker had a ferry pilot fly the airplane from the maintenance facility in Ohio to the pilot's Nevada-based facility, where the ferry pilot had additional maintenance performed related to the air conditioner, gear door, vacuum pump, and idle adjustment. Upon completion of this maintenance, the right engine was test run for at least 20 minutes and the airplane was returned to the ferry pilot. During the following month, the ferry pilot modified the airplane's fuel system by installing four custom-made ferry fuel tanks in the fuselage, and associated plumbing in the wings, to supplement the existing six certificated fuel tanks. The ferry pilot held an airframe and powerplant mechanic certificate with inspection authorization. He reinspected the airplane, purportedly in accordance with the Piper Aircraft Company's annual inspection protocol, signed the maintenance logbook, and requested Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) approval for his ferry flight. The FAA reported that it did not process the first ferry pilot's ferry permit application because of issues related to the applicant's forms and the FAA inspector's workload. The airplane broker discharged the pilot and contracted with a new ferry pilot (the accident pilot) to immediately pick up the airplane in Nevada and fly it to California, the second ferry pilot's base. The contract specified that the airplane be airworthy. In California, the accident pilot planned to complete any necessary modifications, acquire FAA approval, and then ferry the airplane overseas. The discharged ferry pilot stated to the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) investigator that none of his airplane modifications had involved maintenance in the right engine compartment. He also stated that when he presented the airplane to the replacement ferry pilot (at most 3 hours before takeoff) he told him that fuel lines and fittings in the wings related to the ferry tanks needed to be disconnected prior to flight. During the Safety Board's examination of the airplane, physical evidence was found indicating that the custom-made ferry tank plumbing in the wings had not been disconnected. The airplane wreckage was examined by the NTSB investigation team while on scene and following its recovery. Regarding both engines, no evidence was found of any internal engine component malfunction. Notably, the localized area surrounding and including the right engine-driven fuel pump and its outlet port had sustained significantly greater fire damage than was observed elsewhere. According to the Lycoming engine participant, the damage was consistent with a fuel-fed fire originating in this vicinity, which may have resulted from the engine's fuel supply line "B" nut being loose, a failed fuel line, or an engine-driven fuel pump-related leak. The fuel supply line and its connecting components were not located. The engine-driven fuel pump was subsequently examined by staff from the NTSB's Materials Laboratory. Noted evidence consisted of globules of resolidified metal and areas of missing material consistent with the pump having been engulfed in fire. The staff also examined the airplane. Evidence was found indicating that the fire's area of origin was not within the wings or fuselage, but rather emanated from a localized area within the right engine compartment, where the engine-driven fuel pump and its fuel supply line and fittings were located. However, due to the extensive pre- and post-impact fires, the point of origin and the initiating event that precipitated the fuel leak could not be ascertained. The airplane's "Pilot Operator's Handbook" (POH), provides the procedures for responding to an in-flight fire and securing an engine. It also provides single-engine climb performance data. The POH indicates that the pilot should move the firewall fuel shutoff valve of the affected engine to the "off" position, feather the propeller, close the engine's cowl flaps to reduce drag, turn off the magneto switches, turn off the emergency fuel pump switch and the fuel selector, and pull out the fuel boost pump circuit breaker. It further notes that unless the boost pump's circuit breaker is pulled, the pump will continuously operate. During the wreckage examination, the Safety Board investigators found evidence indicating that the right engine's propeller was feathered. However, contrary to the POH's guidance, the right engine's firewall fuel shutoff valve was not in the "off" position, the cowl flaps were open, the magneto switches were on, the emergency fuel pump switches and the fuel selector were on, and the landing gear was down. Due to fire damage, the position of the fuel boost pump circuit breaker could not be ascertained. Calculations based upon POH data indicate that an undamaged and appropriately configured airplane flying on one engine should have had the capability to climb between 100 and 200 feet per minute and, at a minimum, maintain altitude. Recorded Mode C altitude data indicates that during the last 5 minutes of flight, the airplane descended while slowing about 16 knots below the speed required to maintain altitude.

HISTORY OF FLIGHT On August 28, 2008, at 1434 Pacific daylight time, a Piper PA-31-350 (twin engine airplane), N212HB, experienced a loss of right engine power during en route climb a few minutes after departing from runway 7 at North Las Vegas Airport (VGT), Las Vegas, Nevada. Thereafter, the pilot terminated his intended flight to Palo Alto, California (PAO), and attempted an emergency landing back at VGT. While descending on short final approach, the airplane collided with several objects and ultimately crashed in a residential area about 1.25 miles from the departure runway. The airplane was substantially damaged by fire. The airline transport pilot, who was the sole occupant in the airplane, was fatally injured. Of the five persons who were located at the impacted private residence, one received minor injuries, and four were not injured. The flight was performed under the provisions of 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed, and no flight plan was filed. The airplane was owned and operated by Aeronet Supply, an airplane brokerage company based in Gardena, California. The flight originated from VGT about 1422. According to Aeronet's owner, the recently hired contract ferry (accident) pilot was intending to fly the airplane to Palo Alto (PAO), where the connection of previously installed ferry tanks and avionics would be completed. Thereafter, upon obtaining Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) approval, the accident pilot was to ferry the airplane to Korea for delivery to its prospective new owner. The National Transportation Safety Board investigator's review of recorded radar and audio data indicated that after the pilot took off from VGT's runway 7 (elevation 2,205 feet mean sea level (msl)), he commenced a counterclockwise left climbing turn to a westerly course. By 1427, the airplane had passed abeam and north of VGT and was climbing on a westerly track through 3,400 feet, as indicated by its altitude encoding Mode C transponder. By 1429, the airplane was about 5 miles west of VGT and had climbed to 3,900 feet, which was the maximum altitude gained during the accident flight. During the next minute, the airplane commenced a left turn to a southwesterly heading and descended to 3,600 feet. By 1431, the airplane had descended to 3,500 feet and was about 7 miles west of VGT, which was the location farthest west of the airport that was reached during the flight. The pilot reversed course, and while tracking in an easterly direction (toward VGT) at 1431:29, the pilot advised the Las Vegas Terminal Radar Approach Control (TRACON) facility that he was declaring an emergency and desired to immediately return to VGT. By this time, the airplane had descended to 3,100 feet. Without delay, the TRACON controller cleared the pilot as requested. At 1432:05, the pilot broadcast that he had an "engine failure rough engine." At this time, the airplane's altitude was 2,800 feet, and the airplane continued tracking toward runway 7. Its last recorded position was at 1433:48. At this time, the airplane had descended to 2,400 feet and was within about 400 feet of the initial point of impact (IPI). Three witnesses were located at their residences within approximately 1.5 miles of each other and 6 to 7 miles west of VGT. The witnesses reported observing the accident airplane as it flew past their locations, and they provided statements of their observations. The first witness stated that the airplane flew over her house. The witness stated "I heard several pops so I looked out my back window and saw the right side engine putting out black smoke." Thereafter, the airplane made a hard left turn and headed in an easterly direction toward VGT. The second witness reported that he observed the airplane flying in a southerly direction past his home. Thereafter, the airplane turned toward the east. The witness stated that he initially observed puffs of smoke, and then there was a continuous stream of smoke coming from the airplane's right engine. No smoke was seen coming from the left engine. The smoke was white. As the airplane proceeded east of his location (toward VGT) flames were noted beneath the airplane's right engine. He stated that the flames were orange. Then, there was a "ball of flame" below the area of the engine. There were no flames anywhere else beneath the airplane. The witness stated that he heard three "boom" sounds that were like a backfire as the airplane descended. The third witness provided the Safety Board investigator with a sketch documenting his observations regarding the airplane's flight track, fire, and smoke. The witness reported observing the airplane flying in a southerly direction over his residence. The witness stated that he lost sight of the airplane for a few seconds, and when he reacquired visual contact with it, the airplane was about 1 mile south of his location and was heading in an easterly direction toward VGT. The witness stated that he saw a "continuous stream" of white smoke streaming from the right engine of the airplane as it was descending in an easterly direction. The witness further reported that he observed fire and flames beneath the right engine. No fire was present beneath the right wing tip area. When the flames increased in size, he heard a couple of explosions and saw a fireball that got larger. The third witness also stated that the left engine produced two or three quick puffs of smoke. One smoke stream was about 20 feet long, and then the smoke stopped. At no time did he observe fire coming from the left engine. During the entire time the witness observed the airplane, he heard a continuous engine running sound, and at no time did he hear "sputtering." The witness also stated that the airplane's landing gear was retracted. As the airplane approached the airport, a witness driving on the street several houses away from the crash site observed it. The witness stated that as the airplane descended, she saw smoke and flames emanating from its right side. The airplane impacted power lines, nosed over, and crashed into a house in an inverted attitude. Thereafter, an explosion, fireball, and smoke were observed. The Safety Board investigator's examination of the accident site revealed evidence of a severed tree top, downed power lines, and the airplane's right wing tip in the street, yards west of the main wreckage. The airplane's fuselage came to rest in an inverted attitude on a concrete block wall between two houses. Several unidentified first responders reported to the Safety Board investigator that the airplane was engulfed in flames immediately upon impacting the ground. PERSONNEL INFORMATION The 38-year-old pilot held an airline transport pilot certificate. He had commercial privileges for single engine land and sea airplanes. The pilot also held an airframe and powerplant mechanic certificate with inspection authorization. According to the pilot's resume, dated August 26, 2008, his total flight time was 3,195.3 hours. He had 2,733.1 hours as pilot-in-command, and 797.7 hours in airplanes. The pilot reported to the airplane's owner that he had 100 hours of flying experience in the PA-31 model of airplane. In May 2007, the pilot was issued a first-class aviation medical certificate with the restriction that he wear corrective lenses. On this date, the pilot reported that his total flight time was 2,510 hours. A review of the pilot's initial flight training logbooks revealed no evidence of military flight training. The pilot had no reported previous flying experience in the accident airplane. The pilot was not familiar with the specific ferry tank installation in the accident airplane. AIRCRAFT INFORMATION The Piper PA-31-350 "Chieftain," serial number 31-8152072, was manufactured in 1981. The FAA issued the airplane a standard airworthiness certificate in the normal category. The airplane was equip