Back to Search

NTSB investigation record

WPR10GA102

Completed

Hughes 369D· N500LW

Date
January 8, 2010
Location
Kooskia, ID
Conditions
VMC
Record
Published September 25, 2020

Primary finding

Probable cause

A complete loss of engine power due to the failure of the No. 2 bearing, which was precipitated by electrical arcing that occurred at an unknown time prior to the accident flight.

Investigator assessment

Analysis narrative

The pilot was maneuvering the helicopter for a wolf-capturing mission above rugged terrain densely populated by trees. As the pilot maneuvered the helicopter in a hover about 300 to 400 feet above the ground, a loud "bang" emitted from the engine compartment, followed by a loss of engine power and slight vibration. With the low rpm light illuminated, the pilot lowered the collective and entered an autorotation; the helicopter landed hard. A postaccident examination of the engine revealed metal particles adhering to both engine chip detector plugs. Disassembly of the engine revealed that the No. 2 bearing failed. The damage identified on the bearing’s outer race was consistent with electrical arcing. The extensive wear and mechanical damage to the bearing raceways and the bearing balls precluded the identification of arcing damage on the raceways and ball surfaces. However, the arcing damage found was sufficient to precipitate a bearing failure such as was found on accident engine. The bearings are a common source of electrical grounding between the case of a turbine engine and the rotating components. Hence, bearings are a probable location of electrical arcing if conditions are sufficient. Although the exact source of electrical arc could not be determined for the helicopter, it is possible that a lightning strike or stray electrical current could have precipitated such damage. The metal splatter deposits present on the oil slinger surfaces were approximately aligned in the same direction suggesting that the arcing associated with the oil slinger occurred when the engine compressor was not rotating. Although the chip detector caution indicator was found to be inoperative, it is unknown whether it would have alerted the pilot soon enough to the impending engine failure for him to execute a precautionary landing.

Source record

Factual narrative

HISTORY OF FLIGHT On January 08, 2010, about 1220 mountain standard time, a Hughes 369D, N500LW, experienced a loss of engine power and landed hard in the wilderness near Kooskia, Idaho. The helicopter was being operated under contract to the Idaho Department of Fish and Game by Quicksilver Air, Inc., as a public flight. The air transport pilot and two passengers sustained serious injuries; the helicopter sustained substantial damage. The local area flight originated from a ranger station about 25 minutes prior to the accident. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed, and no flight plan was filed. During a telephone conversation with an NTSB investigator, one of the passengers reported that both he and the other passenger were employed by the Idaho Department of Fish and Game. He stated that the purpose of the flight was a wolf capturing mission. While maneuvering around the area where Kelly Creek and Moose Creek intersect, several wolves were spotted. As the pilot maneuvered the helicopter closer to the wolves' location, a loud "bang" emitted from the engine compartment, followed by a loss of engine power and slight vibration. The rugged terrain below was densely populated by trees. With the low rotor rpm light illuminated, the pilot attempted to fly the helicopter toward an opening. The helicopter landed hard on ice. After being released from the hospital the pilot spoke to an NTSB investigator and recalled that prior to the accident, he was maneuvering the helicopter in a hover about 300 to 400 feet above the ground. He heard a "bang," which was immediately followed by the nose yawing to the left and the engine out light illuminating. He lowered the collective and entered an autorotation. The pilot further reported that he had a transient chip light illuminate [Engine Chips] for several seconds about one hour prior to the accident. He stated that he performed a check on the enunciator panel at that time and all lights were operational; no other lights illuminated until the loss of power. AIRCRAFT INFORMATION The Hughes 369D, serial number 470120D, was manufactured in 1977, and had accrued a total time in service of about 13,197 hours at the time of the accident. The owner procured the helicopter in April 2005. The last airframe inspection occurred on December 31, 2009, about 30 flight hours prior to the accident. The helicopter was equipped with a Rolls-Royce 250-C20B Turboshaft engine, serial number CAE-833319, rated at 420 shaft horse power (SHP). The engine had accumulated a total time in service of 7,241.9 hours and had undergone a gearbox repair in October 2009, with the engine being reinstalled on the airframe on November 02, 2009. The engine's compressor assembly, part number (P/N) 6890550 had accumulated 301.9 hours since overhaul and was installed in the accident helicopter in June 2009, about 6 months prior to the accident. A review of the records revealed that during the overhaul, a new No. 2 bearing was installed: P/N 6889093AL, serial number (S/N) TA 36-0510763; this is the bearing that was believed to be on the helicopter at the time of the accident. The operator stated that since owning the helicopter there was no welding or high-energy maintenance performed on the helicopter. It was further noted that the helicopter was not used for any hot line powerline work and was never grounded on the ramp except routine fueling standard grounds provided by fueling facilities. The Rolls-Royce/Allison 250-C20B is a two-shaft turboshaft engine with a combination compressor, which consists of a six-stage axial compressor attached to a one-stage centrifugal compressor. The engine incorporates a reverse-flow annular combustor, a two-stage high-pressure turbine (also referred to as the N1 gas producer turbine), and a two-stage low-pressure turbine (also referred to as the N2 power turbine). The gas path along the Rolls-Royce/Allison 250 engine flows into the inlet, through the compressor's axial and centrifugal stages, into two external air transfer tubes and to the combustor, which is located at the very rear of the engine. The gases then turn 180 degrees toward the front of the engine and proceed through the two-stage gas producer turbine (N1) and the two-stage power turbine (N2). Finally, the gases are directed out of the exhaust collector and upward through two exhaust outlets. N1, consisting of turbine wheels and nozzles #1 and #2, drives the compressor section of the engine through an inner shaft, while N2, consisting of turbine wheels and nozzles #3 and #4, drives the power output gear (to the main rotor transmission) and the accessory gearbox through an outer shaft. The inner shaft rotates independently within the outer shaft. TESTS AND RESEARCH The fuselage sustained significant damage with most damage on the left side. The aft compartment floor was pushed upward approximately 8 inches on the left side. There were multiple main rotor blade strikes to the tail boom, which was separated at fuselage station 240. Examination of the flight control system revealed no evidence of mechanical malfunction or failure. The visual inspection of the fuselage and airframe components during the wreckage inspection did not detect any burn marks, arcing, pitting, or signs of high temperatures stress associated with electrical arcing. Engine Examination External examination of the engine revealed that it had sustained crush damage to the combustor case. A speed handle was inserted into the N1 and N2 tachometer drive pads on the gearbox housing. Rotational continuity was established for the N2 gear train and it was found to rotate freely without binding. During the attempted rotation of the N1 gear train, heavy binding was felt. The engine chip detectors were found to contain many metal particles imbedded. Further disassembly revealed that the No. 2 bearing, P/N 6889093AL, was fractured. The ball bearing retainer was separated in two locations and numerous balls within were gouged on their surface and deformed. A thin oil film was present and no noticeable discoloration was observed. The shim and oil slinger were intact. The compressor case halves were removed, revealing that the rotor assembly was intact with no evidence of damage observed. The diffuser scroll exhibited circumferential rubbing, consistent with the impeller blades making contact. The impeller blades were slightly rubbed with shiny metal showing and a lip of material displaced opposite the direction of rotation. The No. 1 bearing was intact and had a thin oil film; it was normal in coloration. The accessory gearbox housing was removed and investigators again attempted to rotate the N1 gear train via the N1 tachometer drive pad noting that the binding was still present. The gears appeared to all be intact with an oil film present. Metallic chips (ferrous) were present throughout the gearbox. Binding was noted during rotation of the pump gear train, but loosened with continuous rotation. Removal of the oil and scavenge pump revealed that the gears were intact with metallic chips present. Light circumferential rubbing was noted on the separator plate (where the gear interfaced). The turbine section was removed and partially disassembled. The Nos. 6, 7, and 8 bearings were intact and rotated freely in a thin oil film. Molten metal deposits were observed throughout the turbine section. The nozzle shield appeared normal. The fractured No. 2 bearing was a Federal Aviation Administration (FAA)- Parts Manufacture Approval (PMA) replacement part for Rolls Royce P/N 6889093; it was identified as being manufactured by Timken Alcor Aerospace Technologies, Inc. Bearing Examination Examination of the ball retainer at the NTSB Materials Laboratory revealed that it was fractured in several places. The fracture surfaces on the retainer pieces were too damaged to determine the micro mode of fracture. The outer raceway was damaged due

Continue research

Find similar accidents

Continue with the strongest shared characteristics.