Back to Search

NTSB investigation record

WPR17FA057

Completed

Beech 300· N385KA

Date
January 23, 2017
Location
Tucson, AZ
Conditions
VMC
Record
Published September 25, 2020

Primary finding

Probable cause

The pilot's exceedance of the airplane's critical angle of attack during takeoff, which resulted in an aerodynamic stall. Contributing to the accident was the pilot's impairment by the effects of a combination of psychoactive substances.

Investigator assessment

Analysis narrative

The pilot and the passenger departed on a cross-country, personal flight in the airplane that the operator had purchased the day before the accident. Shortly after takeoff, after reaching an altitude of about 100 to 150 ft above the runway in a nose-high pitch attitude, the airplane rolled left to an inverted position as its nose dropped, and it descended to terrain impact on airport property, consistent with an aerodynamic stall. Postaccident examination of the accident site revealed propeller strike marks separated at distances consistent with both propellers rotating at the speed required for takeoff and in a normal blade angle range of operation at impact. Both engines exhibited rotational scoring signatures that indicated the engines were producing symmetrical power and were most likely operating in the mid-to upper-power range at impact. The engines did not display any pre-impact anomalies or distress that would have precluded normal engine operation before impact. No evidence was found of any preexisting mechanical anomalies that would have precluded normal operation of the airplane. Toxicology testing revealed the pilot's use of multiple psychoactive substances including marijuana, venlafaxine, amphetamine, pseudoephedrine, clonazepam, and pheniramine. The wide variety of psychoactive effects of these medications precludes predicting the specific effects of their use in combination. However, it is likely that the pilot was impaired by the effects of the combination of psychoactive substances he was using and that those effects contributed to his loss of control. The investigation was unable to obtain medical records regarding any underlying neuropsychiatric disease(s); therefore, whether these may have contributed to the accident circumstances could not be determined.

Source record

Factual narrative

The TUS special weather observation at 1240 reported wind from 240° at 12 knots gusting to 22 knots, visibility 10 miles, ceiling overcast at 6,000 ft above ground level, temperature 19°C, dew point 6°C, and altimeter 29.89 inches of mercury. The 2-minute average wind in the 5-minute period surrounding the time of the accident was from 230° magnetic at 13 to 15 knots with gusts to 22 knots. Runway 11L had a magnetic heading of 123°, which resulted in a 12- to 14-knot crosswind and a 4-knot tailwind based on the sustained wind and a 21-knot crosswind and a 6-knot tailwind based on the peak wind gust. For further weather information, see the meteorological factual report in the public docket for this investigation. The pilot, age 56, held an airline transport pilot certificate with an airplane multi-engine land rating and type ratings in DA-200, SA-227, BE300, CL604-605, and CASA 212 airplanes. He held commercial privileges in airplane single-engine land and sea airplanes. The pilot was issued a first-class Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) medical certificate on April 5, 2016, with no limitations. The pilot did not report his flight experience on his most recent FAA medical certificate application. On the application from July 7, 2014, he reported a total of 12,000 hours flight experience with 400 hours in the last 6 months. On the July 22, 2013, application, he did not report his flight time, and on the October 12, 2012, application, he reported 12,000 hours total with 400 hours in the last 6 months. On the March 15, 2012, application, he reported 9,000 hours total with 500 hours in the last 6 months. The pilot's personal flight logbooks were not available for examination during the investigation. In a resume submitted to his last employer, dated October 2016, the pilot reported a total flight experience of 15,100 hours, including 13,000 hours as pilot-in-command. He reported 9,500 hours in multi-engine airplanes, over 9,000 hours in turboprop airplanes, 3,500 hours in jet airplanes, and 3,900 hours in amphibious/float airplanes. Between 1979 and 1988, he served on active duty in the United States Air Force. Throughout his aviation career, he flew as a line and corporate pilot for various companies. He also flew in Afghanistan and Iraq as a contracted pilot through the Air Force and as a captain for various companies in Africa and Saudi Arabia. The eight-seat, twin-engine, low-wing, retractable-landing-gear airplane, serial number FA-42, was manufactured in 1985. It was powered by two Pratt & Whitney PT-6A-60, 1,050-horsepower turboprop engines. Each engine drove a Hartzell HC-B4MP-3B four-bladed constant-speed propeller with feathering and reversing capabilities. Review of maintenance records showed that the most recent airframe, engine, and propeller inspections were completed on January 19, 2017, at a total airframe time of 9,962.7 hours. On January 22, 2017, the airplane was flown from Long Beach, California, to Tucson, Arizona as a pre-buy and post-maintenance test flight in order for KAAZ, LLC to purchase the airplane. During that flight, the airplane was still under the ownership of the seller. The flight was conducted by the seller's contracted pilot, with the accident pilot and a pilot- rated passenger on board. The seller's contracted pilot reported that during the flight, the accident pilot did not fly the airplane. After completion of the flight, sale's transactions were finished, and the airplane's ownership was transferred to KAAZ, LLC. In a post-flight conversation with the KAAZ, LLC's representative, the accident pilot reported no issues with the airplane, and the representative had the impression that the accident pilot had flown the airplane. The representative further stated that she had been told that the pilot-rated passenger would be the pilot -in -command and that the accident pilot would be allowed to fly the airplane during the flight; the representative was not aware that the accident pilot did not fly the airplane during this flight and was unaware of the seller's contracted pilot's presence in the airplane. The accident site was located on the ramp adjacent to the south terminal. The initial impact point was about 4,000 ft from the departure end of runway 11L. A debris path led north from the impact point about 650 ft across the ramp to the main wreckage, which was resting against an 8-ft-tall concrete wall. A postimpact fire damaged the wreckage. All major structural components of the airplane were located within the wreckage debris path. The first identified point of contact (FIPC) was a slash mark from the left propeller on the ground located about 250 ft from the terminal building. Four propeller strike marks created by the left propeller and three propeller strike marks created by the right propeller were observed with 25 to 27 inches distance between each mark. According to the representative from Hartzell Propeller Inc., those distances suggested rotation at or near the rated speed of 1,700 rpm at the estimated impact velocity. The debris path from the FIPC to the main wreckage was marked by charred, black burned stains and smudges. A portion of the right wing spar was separated and found 52 ft from the FIPC. The right wing tip separated from the wing and came to rest 223 ft from the FIPC. The left propeller assembly was found 470 ft east of the FIPC. Three out of four propeller blades were still attached to the hub. The fourth blade was found near the main wreckage. The main wreckage consisted of the cabin, fuselage, portions of both wings, a compression section of the right engine, a compression section and accessory gearbox of the left engine, the right propeller, and the empennage. These components were damaged by the impact and burned by the postimpact fire. The right propeller assembly was located under the wreckage. Three blades were attached to the hub; the fourth blade was located 460 ft north of the main wreckage. The cockpit area was displaced rearwards into the cabin. The instrument panel was mostly consumed by fire. The left wing was separated from the fuselage; both aileron cables were separated at the root. The aileron bellcrank was attached to the spar, and the cable was attached from the bellcrank to the root. The inboard portion of the right wing was held on to the fuselage by flight control cables only. The left and right flaps were in their retracted positions on the flap tracks. The left flap actuators were separated from their drive cables. The left inboard flap actuator measured at 4 inches, which corresponded to a 10° extended position. The left outboard flap actuator was partially melted, and its position could not be determined. The right inboard and outboard flap actuators measured at 2.2 inches, which corresponded to a retracted position. The empennage separated from the fuselage on the left side and was bent to the right. The right side of the empennage was still attached to the fuselage by its skin. The emergency locator transmitter was located in the empennage area, and it was intact. The elevator cable was connected to bellcrank, and both pushrods were connected to the elevator. The right and left elevator trim actuators measured at 1.5 inches and 1.4 inches, respectively, which corresponded to a 10° tab-down position. Both cables were connected to the rudder trim servo actuator. The rudder boost switch was found in the "RUDDER BOOST" position. The main and nose landing gear were found in the up (retracted) position. Flight control cable continuity was established from each cockpit control to the associated flight control. The left engine power section and the propeller were impact-separated from the engine. The power turbine shaft was fractured, and the exhaust duct was severely compressed. Circumferential rubbing and machining were displayed on the compressor turbine, the power turbine guide vane, the interstage baffle, and t

Continue research

Find similar accidents

Continue with the strongest shared characteristics.